Arafat's profileصفحات في دفتر مهاجرPhotosBlogListsMore ![]() | Help |
|
September 29 عندما فاض الكيل بالقرضاوي
September 28 She stood firm defending her home, and, like an Olive tree, died standingMaisa Abu Ghazala – Palestine News Network - Translated by; Saed Bannoura - IMEMC
Posted September 22, 2008 September 27 Marathon for Children: Running for the Right to PlayRamzy Baroud
EVERY ‘TERRORIST’ HAS A MOTHER Another tale from the hospital…..Desertpeace
September 26, 2008 During
my first week at the hospital I was witness to the first hand brutality
against the people of Palestine. A bed was wheeled into my room by two
young Israeli soldiers wearing identification badges of the Military
Police. In the bed was a young boy, both legs in casts and signs of
beatings on his head and face.
I
innocently asked the soldiers what was going on…. and was quickly
informed that the boy was a 'terrorist’ and is in their custody until
he is able to leave the hospital and go to a military prison.
"Terrorist" I declared….. you guys are holding loaded machine guns
while he is strapped to a bed all broken up from head to foot!!! He has
a bullet in each of his legs and you say he’s the terrorist…The
response was that "he threw stones at an army jeep". I asked where the
jeep was at the time and they told me it was in a small Palestinian
village just outside of Bethlehem.
I
went to talk to the young lad at that point…. he denied all charges,
told me his name was Hanyeh and begged me to get word to his family
that he was in the hospital and alive. He apparently was in custody for
two weeks at that time and his family was not informed if he was dead
or alive or where he was. A young lad of only 17 possibly being mourned
by his parents who way to often witnessed young boys disappear never to
be seen again…
I
asked him what his home phone number was, there wasn’t one. I asked the
name of his village and was told. Fortunately I knew some people there
and was able to reach them and was able to get word to Hanyeh’s mother
about his whereabouts.
The
next morning there she was standing in front of me. Disregarding all
traditions associated with religious Muslim women, she put her arms
around me and kissed me on both cheeks, crying and thanking me at the
same time. The boy was asleep, I woke him and told him he had a
guest….. "MAMA"!!! It was a very moving scene. The police intervened at
that point and told her to leave and not speak to him…. my immediate
reaction was "not on my watch!" I told the young soldier to shut his
eyes and his mouth and allow them to have a short visit. By some
miracle, the soldier turned around and left the room…
After
a few minutes the mother asked me for my cellphone number and asked if
her husband can call later and speak to the boy… of course I agreed. I
also told her that if she was able to visit again to tell the soldiers
that she was visiting me, and from my bed she could speak to her son.
A
week later the boy was moved to a different ward where it was a bit
more difficult for family visits. The soldiers informed me on more than
one occasion that Hanyeh asked for me every day, my new friend the
'terrorist’.
I
can’t help but ask what would have happened if I wasn’t in the room
when the young lad arrived. Would his family ever been told where he
was or why? This is not an isolated incident, unfortunately these
actions by the Israeli Military are the norm. The prisons here are full
of young Palestinian 'terrorists’, many of whom were never brought to
trial or officially charged , as was the case with Hanyeh.
The signature quote on my email is "To believe in something and not live it, is dishonest."
~ Mahatma Gandhi ~ I think I was being honest by living my beliefs during that period.
It
also made me realise how more efficiently the hospital itself could run
if it wasn’t used as an extension of the military prison system.
Shepherd boy executed by Israeli settlers while tending flock near NablusMa'an news
شبعنا حكي
How Israeli Backdoor Technology Penetrated the U.S. Government's Telecom System and Compromised National SecurityAn Israeli Trojan HorseBy CHRISTOPHER KETCHAM Since
the late 1990s, federal agents have reported systemic communications
security breaches at the Department of Justice, FBI, DEA, the State
Department, and the White House. Several of the alleged breaches,
these agents say, can be traced to two hi-tech communications
companies, Verint Inc. (formerly Comverse Infosys), and Amdocs Ltd.,
that respectively provide major wiretap and phone
billing/record-keeping software contracts for the U.S. government.
Together, Verint and Amdocs form part of the backbone of the
government’s domestic intelligence surveillance technology. Both
companies are based in Israel – having arisen to prominence from that
country’s cornering of the information technology market – and are
heavily funded by the Israeli government, with connections to the
Israeli military and Israeli intelligence (both companies have a long
history of board memberships dominated by current and former Israeli
military and intelligence officers). Verint is considered the world
leader in “electronic interception” and hence an ideal private sector
candidate for wiretap outsourcing. Amdocs is the world’s largest
billing service for telecommunications, with some $2.8 billion in
revenues in 2007, offices worldwide, and clients that include the top
25 phone companies in the United States that together handle 90 percent
of all call traffic among U.S. residents. The companies’ operations,
sources suggest, have been infiltrated by freelance spies exploiting
encrypted trapdoors in Verint/Amdocs technology and gathering data on
Americans for transfer to Israeli intelligence and other willing
customers (particularly organized crime). “The fact of the
vulnerability of our telecom backbone is indisputable,” says a high
level U.S. intelligence officer who has monitored the fears among
federal agents. “How it came to pass, why nothing has been done, who
has done what – these are the incendiary questions.” If the
allegations are true, the electronic communications gathered up by the
NSA and other U.S. intelligence agencies might be falling into the
hands of a foreign government. Reviewing the available evidence,
Robert David Steele, a former CIA case officer and today one of the
foremost international proponents for “public intelligence in the
public interest,” tells me that “Israeli penetration of the entire US
telecommunications system means that NSA's warrantless wiretapping
actually means Israeli warrantless wiretapping.” More.............. قراءة في المواقف المتباينة من تصريحات الدكتور القرضاوي من الشيعةقراءة في المواقف المتباينة من تصريحات الدكتور القرضاوي من الشيعة
27-9-2008
ساري عرابي / كاتب فلسطيني Sari.orabi@gmail.com
فمن
الواضح تماماً أن الشيعة المقاومين للمشروع الصهيوني على اختلاف نواياهم
من هذه المقاومة، لا يميزون بين تشيعهم ومقاومتهم، وكأن تأييدهم في
مقاومتهم لا يكفي، بل لا بد من غض الطرف عن تشيعهم، حتى لو هدد نسيجنا
الاجتماعي، وتطاول على معتقداتنا ورموز ديننا وتاريخنا الإسلامي كأمهات
المؤمنين والصحابة، رضوان الله عليهم، وكأن على هذه الأمة ـ إن لم تتشيع ـ
أن تستحيل إلى ببغاء مسلوب الإرادة وبوق دعائي، لا يصدح إلا بما يراه
الشيعة!
الضجة
التي تلت تصريحات فضيلة الشيخ الدكتور يوسف القرضاوي من التشيع كفرقة لها
خصوصيتها العقدية المخالفة لعموم الأمة، وكحركة دؤوبة في محاولة اختراق
المجتمعات السنية، كانت كبيرة كما يظهر للمتابعين والمهتمين بهذه القضايا؛
حجم هذه الضجة انعكاس لحجم وشهرة الدكتور القرضاوي الطاغية وحضوره الكبير
في الأمة وتمثيله لتيار واسع فيها، فمواقف الدكتور وتصريحاته ـ غالباً ـ
أبعد أثراً من كثير من علماء الأمة ـ مع الحب والتقدير للجميع ـ،
لاعتبارات كثيرة، أهمها انتشار الشيخ إعلامياً وتبني مقولاته الفقهية في
تيار دعوي وحركي واسع فيها، ثم لنشاطه العلمي والدعوي الكبير، وتبنيه
لقضايا مختلفة في حاضر الأمة وتأسيسه أو دعمه لجملة من المشاريع الإعلامية
والخيرية ورئاسته للاتحاد العالمي لعلماء المسلمين والمجلس الأوروبي
للإفتاء وعضوية المجامع الفقهية والعلمية. إلا أن
الضجة لم تتوقف على حجم الدكتور ـ حفظه الله ـ وحسب، حيث إن هذه لم تكن
المرة الأولى التي يكشف فيها الدكتور عن موقفه من عملية الغزو الشيعي
المبرمج للمجتمعات السنية، وبعض ما يتصل بالاعتقاد الشيعي، خاصة فيما يمس
عقائد أهل السنة وتاريخ الأمة ومنشأ الإسلام. غضب العوا على "المصريون" !
تاريخ ومخططات الشيعة في مصرتاريخ ومخططات الشيعة في مصر
تحقيق:أعده: علي صلاح
مفكرة الإسلام: كثر
الحديث في الآونة الأخيرة عن مخططات لنشر التشيع في مصر بشكل واسع؛ وذلك
إثر الغزو الأمريكي للعراق وهجرة عدد كبير من العراقيين إلى الخارج وتوجه
البعض منهم إلى القاهرة، حيث تركز غالبيتهم في مدينة 6 أكتوبر حتى قيل:
إنها أصبحت مستعمرة للشيعة العراقيين"، وأنهم بصدد بناء حسينيات فيها،
وتواردت أنباء حول أنشطة "تبشيرية" لهم وسط المواطنين المصريين السنة،
وأكد ذلك محاولات إيران لتحسين العلاقات مع مصر عن طريق تصريحات لبعض
مسئوليها وإقامة عدد من المشروعات الصناعية، ثم جاءت التحذيرات التي
أطلقها عدد من المسئولين السياسيين والدينيين في مصر بشأن محاولات اختراق
البلاد عن طريق نشر التشيع لتثير المزيد من الهواجس حول الموضوع.
تاريخ التشيع في مصر
دخل
التشيع إلى مصر عن طريق الدولة الفاطمية العبيدية، وهم من الشيعة
الإسماعيلية، وحكموا مصر من سنة 358هـ (969م) إلى سنة 567هـ (1171م)،
وينتسب العبيديون إلى عبد الله بن ميمون القداح بن ديصان البوني من
الأهواز، وهو مجوسي ومن أشهر الدعاة السريين الباطنيين، ومن دعوته هذه
صيغت دعوة القرامطة. ومن أبرز حكام الدولة العبيدية: الحاكم بأمر الله
الذي ادّعى الألوهية، ومن أهم معتقداتهم التناسخ والحلول، ويزعمون أن روح
القدس انتقلت من آدم إلى علي بن أبي طالب، ثم انتقلت روح علي إلى الحاكم
بأمر الله. وكان آخر حكامهم في مصر العاضد، وقد تمكن صلاح الدين الأيوبي
من القضاء على دولتهم، وبالرغم مما مارسه هؤلاء العبيديون من البطش
والدعوة السرية لنشر مذهبهم الشيعي الإسماعيلي، إلا أنه ظل مذهبًا غريبًا
دخيلاً، وظلت مصر سنيّة. More..................... September 21 Water Car ... Daniel Dingel
08:50:46 am, Categories: Videos, 134 words Who was involved in 9/11? Documentary reveals shocking facts09/15/08ZERO : An Investigation Into 9/11 - PART 1 of 10 PART 2 PART 3 PART 4 PART 5 PART 6 PART 7 PART 8 PART 9 PART 10 Zero: An Investigation into 9/11 official website: http://zero911movie.com/site/ THEY WANT MAMA TO MAKE IT ALL BETTER! Rep KaptureTHEY WANT MAMA TO MAKE IT ALL BETTER! Rep Kapture09/18/08
03:34:14 pm, Categories: Videos, 8 words September 20 الخطر الشيعي ومسؤولية العلماء
DID VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY CAUSE OR ALLOW 9-11 TO HAPPEN?A Review of Crossing the Rubicon and The New Pearl Harbor
By Douglas R. Page
I INTRODUCTION
It is very difficult to have a rational discussion with some people about the unanswered questions arising from 9-11. On the other hand, 42% of the people across the nation believe the Official Kean Commission Report was a whitewash. For all of us, there is a sense that the truth of Bush Administration involvement would be too frightening to accept. It might cause us to lose our jobs, or be put in jail. It would require some action on our part. It would demolish our comfortable lives and our sense of well-being and security. It is simply too monstrous for many humans to face. Many liberals are those who want to be somewhat sensitive to the injustices of the world without having to sacrifice one iota of their privileges. Thus liberals often give support to and benefit from capitalism and from US imperialism. These liberals thus may not wish to confront the facts of 9-11. Why are there are so many vigorous critics of those of us who question the official story of 9-11? We
know from Carl Bernstein’s (of Woodward, Bernstein Deep Throat fame)
article in Rolling Stone in 1976 that the CIA then had some 400
“journalist-plants” in the mainstream media including the liberal and
progressive media, who were directed to publish stories favorable to
the CIA and to counter unfavorable stories. Given the changes since 9-11, it is fair to assume there are many more CIA planted journalists in the media now in 2006. More............................. AIPAC OUTLINETHE AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE also known as AIPAC
“AIPAC is America’s Pro Israel Lobby,” says its masthead. Its stated purpose is to lobby for policies and issues that are in the best interests of Israel and of America. It is a registered lobby. Fortune lists it as being the 2nd most powerful lobby in Washington, AARP being the first. However, AIPAC is widely regarded as the most effective foreign policy lobby. It was created in 1951.
Membership is apparently open to anyone. There are now 100,000 members and it has grown rapidly since 9-11. The annual operating budget is $40 Million. Although, one apparently does not have to join a membership club, there are 6: The Minyan Club for those who give $100,000 or more per year The Chairman’s Council for those giving $36K or more The President’s Cabinet for those giving $25K The Senate Club for those giving $10K The Capitol Club for those giving $3,600 or more The Washington Club for those giving $1,500 or more
AIPAC’s Board of Directors consists of 46 persons. I could not find out how they are elected. Each is quite wealthy, and they contribute an average of $70,000 per year each. One Director gave $51 Million. The Board consists of Wall Street lawyers, stock brokers, heirs to family fortunes and real estate developers. AIPAC’s 51 person Executive Committee is also called the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations CPMJO. It is supposed to represent a consensus of American Jews, but it is dominated by one man, Malcolm Hoenlein, a supporter of the Likud Party. He believes that Jews have a right to occupy and live in the West Bank permanently. According to the Jewish Bulletin, it is dedicated to the “unequivocal support of every Israeli government.” My research persuades me that this is also the objective of AIPAC. CPMJO concentrates on lobbing the Executive Branch of the US government, the President, the State Department, the Department of Defense, the Intelligence Agencies, while AIPAC concentrates on Congress.
AIPAC has many satellite organizations or committees or separate organizations with which it works in tandem some of which are: More........................ September 17 BOOKS-IRAQ: "We Blew Her to Pieces"By Dahr Jamail MARFA, Texas, Sep 16 (IPS) - Aside from the Iraqi people, nobody knows what the U.S. military is doing in Iraq better than the soldiers themselves. A new book gives readers vivid and detailed accounts of the devastation the U.S. occupation has brought to Iraq, in the soldiers' own words. "Winter Soldier Iraq and Afghanistan: Eyewitness Accounts of the Occupation," published by Haymarket Books Tuesday, is a gut-wrenching, historic chronicle of what the U.S. military has done to Iraq, as well as its own soldiers. Authored by Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) and journalist Aaron Glantz, the book is a reader for hearings that took place in Silver Spring, Maryland between Mar. 13-16, 2008 at the National Labour College. "I remember one woman walking by," said Jason Washburn, a corporal in the U.S. Marines who served three tours in Iraq. "She was carrying a huge bag, and she looked like she was heading toward us, so we lit her up with the Mark 19, which is an automatic grenade launcher, and when the dust settled, we realised that the bag was full of groceries. She had been trying to bring us food and we blew her to pieces." Washburn testified on a panel that discussed the rules of engagement in Iraq, and how lax they were, even to the point of being virtually non-existent. "During the course of my three tours, the rules of engagement changed a lot," Washburn's testimony continues. "The higher the threat the more viciously we were permitted and expected to respond." His emotionally charged testimony, like all of those in the book that covered panels addressing dehumanisation, civilian testimony, sexism in the military, veterans' health care, and the breakdown of the military, raised issues that were repeated again and again by other veterans. "Something else we were encouraged to do, almost with a wink and nudge, was to carry 'drop weapons', or by my third tour, 'drop shovels'. We would carry these weapons or shovels with us because if we accidentally shot a civilian, we could just toss the weapon on the body, and make them look like an insurgent," Washburn said. Four days of searing testimony, witnessed by this writer, is consolidated into the book, which makes for a difficult read. One page after another is filled with devastating stories from the soldiers about what is being done in Iraq. Everything from the taking of "trophy" photos of the dead, to torture and slaughtering of civilians is included. "We're trying to build a historical record of what continues to happen in this war and what the war is really about," Glantz told IPS. Hart Viges, a member of the 82nd Airborne Division of the Army who served one year in Iraq, tells of taking orders over the radio. "One time they said to fire on all taxicabs because the enemy was using them for transportation...One of the snipers replied back, 'Excuse me? Did I hear that right? Fire on all taxicabs?' The lieutenant colonel responded, 'You heard me, trooper, fire on all taxicabs.' After that, the town lit up, with all the units firing on cars. This was my first experience with war, and that kind of set the tone for the rest of the deployment." Vincent Emanuele, a Marine rifleman who spent a year in the al-Qaim area of Iraq near the Syrian border, told of emptying magazines of bullets into the city without identifying targets, running over corpses with Humvees and stopping to take "trophy" photos of bodies. "An act that took place quite often in Iraq was taking pot shots at cars that drove by," he said. "This was not an isolated incident, and it took place for most of our eight-month deployment." Kelly Dougherty, the executive director of IVAW, blames the behaviour of soldiers in Iraq on the policies of the U.S. government. "The abuses committed in the occupations, far from being the result of a 'few bad apples' misbehaving, are the result of our government's Middle East policy, which is crafted in the highest spheres of U.S. power," she said. Knowing this, however, does little to soften the emotional and moral devastation of the accounts. "You see an individual with a white flag and he does anything but approach you slowly and obey commands, assume it's a trick and kill him," Michael Leduc, a corporal in the Marines who was part of the U.S. attack of Fallujah in November 2004, said were the orders from his battalion JAG officer he received before entering the city. This is an important book for the public of the United States, in particular, because the Winter Soldier testimonies were not covered by any of the larger media outlets, aside from the Washington Post, which ran a single piece on the event that was buried in the Metro section. The New York Times, CNN, and network news channels ABC, NBC and CBS ignored it completely. This is particularly important in light of the fact that, as former Marine Jon Turner stated, "Anytime we did have embedded reporters with us, our actions changed drastically. We never acted the same. We were always on key with everything, did everything by the book." "To me it's about giving a picture of what war is like," Glantz added, "Because here in the U.S. we have this very sanitised version of what war is. But war is when we have a large group of armed people killing large numbers of other people. And that is the picture that people will get from reading veterans testimony...the true face of war." Dehumanisation of the soldiers themselves is covered in the book, as it includes testimony of sexism, racism, and the plight of veterans upon their return home as they struggle to obtain care from the Veterans Administration. There is much testimony on the dehumanisation of the Iraqi people as well. Brian Casler, a corporal in the Marines, spoke to some of this that he witnessed during the invasion of Iraq. "But on these convoys, I saw marines defecate into MRE bags or urinate in bottles and throw them at children on the side of the road," he stated. Numerous accounts from soldiers include the prevalence of degrading terms for Iraqis, such as "hajis," "towel-heads" and "sand-niggers". Scott Ewing, who served in Iraq from 2005-2006, admitted on one panel that units intentionally gave candy to Iraqi children for reasons other than "winning hearts and minds". "There was also another motive," Ewing said, "If the kids were around our vehicles, the bad guys wouldn't attack. We used the kids as human shields." Glantz admits that it would be difficult for the average U.S. citizen to read the book, and believes it is important to keep in mind while doing so what it took for the veterans to give this historic testimony. "They could have been heroes, but what they are doing here is even more heroic -- which is telling the truth," Glantz told IPS. "They didn't have to come forward. They chose to come forward." http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=43891 Creative Destruction: The Solid Core Behind the Financial CrisisChris Floyd
September 17, 2008 Fed’s $85 Billion Loan Rescues Insurer (NY Times) The bailout [of American International Group]... effectively puts taxpayer money at risk while protecting bad investments made by A.I.G. and other institutions it does business with. Do you get it now? The rich and powerful spend years making foolish deals in a market they rigged with the connivance of utterly corrupted politicians on both sides the aisle; their fraudulent scheme finally collapses, exposing them to some of the most horrific financial losses in history....and YOU will have to pay for it. For generations. Not only directly, with the tax money straight from your pocket, but even more so in the further degradation of national life: infrastructure, services, programs, amenities that will be starved or abandoned as even more of the government's money is poured out to shield the wastrel elite from suffering the consequences of their own rapacious folly. And with all the talk of a "new Cold War," who knew that it would be Washington and Wall Street, not the Kremlin, who resurrected socialism in the 21st century, in what the Times called "the most radical intervention in private business in the central bank’s history"? Socialism for the rich only, to be sure. Ole Joe "Bankruptcy Bill" Biden and his bipartisan cohorts in Congress have long made sure that any ordinary citizen -- especially the old, the sick, the poor, the most desperate -- will be squeezed to the last drop to pay off their debts, even if these were incurred through illness or misfortune. But for our boardroom Bolsheviki, the state is always there, to cushion and to coddle. And who knew there was so much money in the federal coffers? Endless, roaring torrents of money available for the ever-expanding operations of the global Terror War (up to $3 trillion for the rape of Iraq alone), and all of this on top of an ever-expanding "regular" military budget that tops half-a-trillion dollars each and every year. And now tens of billions for Bear-Sterns, Fannie Mae, Fannie Mac, A.I.G. and the next fat-cattery to go under. Gosh, you mean all that cash was just lying around under the federal mattress all along? You mean we could have used some of it for, say, building schools and hospitals, or national health insurance, or rebuilding our globalization-gutted cities, or drug rehab programs, or caring for our elderly, or helping people start businesses, or repairing our rotted infrastructure, or supporting the arts and sciences, or building parks and other "common pleasures, to walk abroad and recreate yourselves"? You mean there has been enough money there all along to help create a more just, equitable, enjoyable and civilized society? Don't that beat all? Well, there will be none of that now, thank god. Even if a party that was actually committed to the well-being and security of ordinary citizens (a description that of course excludes the ticket of "Wall Street Barry" and "Bankruptcy Bill Joe") were to somehow take power one day, they will be hogtied by the mess left behind by the elite's financial boondoggles and their many wars. They'll be lucky if there is enough spare cash on hand to buy a few sandbags the next time a hurricane turns toward New Orleans, much less address any of the massive civic, social, economic and infrastructural disasters that confront us. More......................... Pro-McCain yard sign shows burning twin towers David Edwards and Nick Juliano Published: Wednesday September 17, 2008 A group of Republican activists is displaying signs in Florida with a provocative image of the burning World Trade Center to argue on behalf of John McCain's presidential campaign. The yard sign, which was spotted outside a McCain campaign appearance in Jacksonville, displays the message "Keep America Safe! Vote McCain Palin." The signs were produced by the Ronald Reagan Republican Assembly of Central Florida, a chapter of the National Federation of Republican Assemblies, which appears to be a conservative activist organization unconnected to the party itself. MSNBC's Keith Olbermann noted the sign's existence in a segment in which he also condemned a separate group of conservative activists who are purchasing newspaper insert advertisements including DVDs of the right-wing movie "Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West." Olbermann referred to the DVD as "neocon pornography" and accused the right of using 9/11 as a political tool, a practice he himself has occasionally engaged. "Remind yourself that when we were attacked the government that let us down was Republican and that their new candidate has a secret plan to capture the guy who masterminded 9/11, but he won't tell anybody about it until we elect him president," Olbermann said to end his Monday night segment. This video is from MSNBC's Countdown, broadcast September 15, 2008. |
|
|